Comparative analysis of dry PP diaphragm and wet PE diaphragm in lithium batteries

Ⅰ. Differences in raw materials and process paths
-
Dry diaphragm mainly adopts high isotactic polypropylene as raw material, and forms microporous structure through melt extrusion, shaping and bi-directional stretching. The core of the process lies in the formation of micropores induced by stretching, and the whole process does not use solvents, which is environmentally friendly.
-
Wet diaphragms, on the other hand, use ultra high molecular weight polyethylene as the substrate, mixed with paraffin or liquid hydrocarbons to prepare a colloidal fluid, which is calendered into a film, then solvent extracted to remove the oil phase, and bi-directionally stretched to form a dense, microporous structure. This process is more demanding in terms of equipment and purification systems, but results in porous diaphragms with higher porosity and smaller pore sizes.
II. Microstructure and performance comparison
|
Polypropylene dry diaphragm (PP)
|
Ultra-high polymer polyethylene wet diaphragm (PE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Microstructure | Trapezoidal pores, fibrous arrangement, regular structure | Reticulated porous structure with smaller and denser pores |
| Thickness Range |
16–25 μm
|
8–20 μm
|
| Porosity |
35–45%
|
40–60%
|
| Thermal shutdown temperature |
160–165 °C(PP melting point)
|
130–140 °C(PE melting point)
|
| Electrolyte Wettability | Medium, needs surface treatment | Good, high liquid absorption |
| Mechanical strength | High transverse strength and good puncture resistance | Good flexibility, but weak laterally |
| Costs | relatively low | relatively high |
III. Differences in application areas
|
Areas of application
|
Common Diaphragm Types
|
|---|---|
|
Power battery (lithium iron phosphate)
|
PP dry diaphragm
|
|
Power battery (lithium ternary)
|
PE wet diaphragm
|
|
Energy storage batteries
|
PP dry diaphragm-based
|
|
Consumer electronics (cell phones, laptop computers)
|
PE wet diaphragms are more common
|
IV. Representative raw material companies and main products
Yuhwa Hiden U050 UHMWPE
This resin material is the main raw material for the manufacturing of battery separators produced by Yuhwa. It has excellent impact resistance and superior processing performance. Compared with conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene materials, it has a more convenient processing procedure. At the same time, it is cheaper than Asahi Kasei's ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, so it is welcomed by battery manufacturers from China.
Asahi Kasei UH650 UHMWPE
Asahi Kasei has been exploring the manufacturing of battery separators since the early days of lithium battery development, and now has a very complete product system to meet the needs of different manufacturers.
Sunfine UH650 UHMWPE material adopts a molecular weight design to improve the puncture resistance and impact resistance of the separator; it uses Asahi Kasei's own advanced catalytic technology to minimize metal residues, effectively reducing the risk of equipment damage and effectively improving battery safety.
V. Conclusion
-
Dry PP diaphragm is widely used in lithium iron phosphate batteries, energy storage systems and some low-end consumer electronics products due to its relatively low cost and stable structure.
-
Wet PE diaphragms are dominant in ternary systems, high rate batteries, high-end power batteries (e.g. electric vehicles) and consumer electronics due to their excellent thermal shutdown capability and electrolyte affinity.
What is LCP material
Solutions for Yellowing of Polycarbonate
